| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Acre. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpafac.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Acre. |
|
Data corrente: |
02/09/2014 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
06/07/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
DUCHELLE, A. E.; KAINER, K. A.; WADT, L. H. de O. |
|
Afiliação: |
Amy E. Duchelle, CIFOR; Karen A. Kainer, University of Florida; LUCIA HELENA DE OLIVEIRA WADT, CPAF-AC. |
|
Título: |
Is certification associated with better forest management and socioeconomic benefits? a comparative analysis of three certification schemes applied to Brazil nuts in western Amazonia. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2014 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal, London, v. 27, n. 2, p. 121-139, 2014. |
|
ISSN: |
0894-1920 (impresso), 1521-0723 (Online) |
|
DOI: |
10.1080/08941920.2013.840022 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Nontimber forest product (NTFP) certification has potential to promote sustainable harvest and to bolster rural livelihoods. This research compares environmental and socioeconomic benefits of Brazil nut certification for 231 producers in 17 communities in the trinational border region of Bolivia, Brazil, and Peru during the 2006-2007 harvest. Specific objectives were: (1) to analyze differences in "best management practices" between certified and noncertified producers; (2) to identify socioeconomic benefits associated with certified nuts; and (3) to explore producer perceptions of nut certification. Organic and Fairtrade certification were associated with better postharvest practices and higher prices, while Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification was related to preharvest planning. Certification was viewed most positively in Bolivia, where producers gleaned financial and social benefits, moderately in Peru, and least positively in Brazil, where benefits were lower or nonexistent. Partnerships with cooperatives, donors, government, and nongovernmental organizations were essential to maximize conservation and development objectives. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Amazônia Ocidental; Análisis comparativo; Brasil; Castanha do brasil; Certificação florestal; Certificación forestal; Comparative analysis; Manejo florestal sustentável; Nuez del Brasil; Productos forestales no madereros; Produto florestal não madeireiro (PFNM); Silvicultura sustentable. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura familiar; Análise comparativa; Análise de custo-benefício; Bertholletia excelsa; Castanha do pará; Certificação de produto; Peru. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Bolivia; Brazil nuts; Forest certification; Nontimber forest products; Sustainable forestry. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02750naa a2200457 a 4500
001 1993946
005 2021-07-06
008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0894-1920 (impresso), 1521-0723 (Online)
024 7 $a10.1080/08941920.2013.840022$2DOI
100 1 $aDUCHELLE, A. E.
245 $aIs certification associated with better forest management and socioeconomic benefits? a comparative analysis of three certification schemes applied to Brazil nuts in western Amazonia.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2014
520 $aNontimber forest product (NTFP) certification has potential to promote sustainable harvest and to bolster rural livelihoods. This research compares environmental and socioeconomic benefits of Brazil nut certification for 231 producers in 17 communities in the trinational border region of Bolivia, Brazil, and Peru during the 2006-2007 harvest. Specific objectives were: (1) to analyze differences in "best management practices" between certified and noncertified producers; (2) to identify socioeconomic benefits associated with certified nuts; and (3) to explore producer perceptions of nut certification. Organic and Fairtrade certification were associated with better postharvest practices and higher prices, while Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification was related to preharvest planning. Certification was viewed most positively in Bolivia, where producers gleaned financial and social benefits, moderately in Peru, and least positively in Brazil, where benefits were lower or nonexistent. Partnerships with cooperatives, donors, government, and nongovernmental organizations were essential to maximize conservation and development objectives.
650 $aBolivia
650 $aBrazil nuts
650 $aForest certification
650 $aNontimber forest products
650 $aSustainable forestry
650 $aAgricultura familiar
650 $aAnálise comparativa
650 $aAnálise de custo-benefício
650 $aBertholletia excelsa
650 $aCastanha do pará
650 $aCertificação de produto
650 $aPeru
653 $aAmazônia Ocidental
653 $aAnálisis comparativo
653 $aBrasil
653 $aCastanha do brasil
653 $aCertificação florestal
653 $aCertificación forestal
653 $aComparative analysis
653 $aManejo florestal sustentável
653 $aNuez del Brasil
653 $aProductos forestales no madereros
653 $aProduto florestal não madeireiro (PFNM)
653 $aSilvicultura sustentable
700 1 $aKAINER, K. A.
700 1 $aWADT, L. H. de O.
773 $tSociety & Natural Resources: An International Journal, London$gv. 27, n. 2, p. 121-139, 2014.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Acre (CPAF-AC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
